> You selectively quoted a fraction of my statement and threw in a strawman.
I disagreed with the first part of your statement and agreed with the second part. Are you only reading to respond and not to comprehend? Also, how are studies or facts "a strawman".
What does dealing with those 4 things have to do with your initial gross oversimplification?
No problem. Why the hostility?
> You selectively quoted a fraction of my statement and threw in a strawman.
I disagreed with the first part of your statement and agreed with the second part. Are you only reading to respond and not to comprehend? Also, how are studies or facts "a strawman".
What does dealing with those 4 things have to do with your initial gross oversimplification?