> Unfortunately, Google’s documentation only deems “site abuse reputation” as spam when the site uses third parties to produce and/or publish pages to manipulate search rankings.
The article argues that it will just shift the pattern of spam companies so that they can generate their own spam in-house.
https://housefresh.com/how-google-decimated-housefresh/
> Unfortunately, Google’s documentation only deems “site abuse reputation” as spam when the site uses third parties to produce and/or publish pages to manipulate search rankings.
The article argues that it will just shift the pattern of spam companies so that they can generate their own spam in-house.