Thank you for the amazing links as well! You are right that the article [1] is 6 years old now, and indeed the field has evolved. But the algorithms and techniques I share in the GitHub repo are the "classic" ones (dating back then too), for which that post is still relevant - at least from an historical perspective.
You bring up a very good point though: more recent advancements and assessments should be linked and/or mentioned in the repo (e.g., in the resources and/or an appendix). I will try to do that sometime.
You bring up a very good point though: more recent advancements and assessments should be linked and/or mentioned in the repo (e.g., in the resources and/or an appendix). I will try to do that sometime.