It's superficial analysis to assume that when Mozilla agrees with Google, it's about money. That's merely correlation.
Other people and organizations can disagree with your arguments in ways that you don't think are logical or sound, but that doesn't mean they aren't just based on different weights and criteria. It's not useful to assume the decision criteria, because it becomes too easy to declare yourself right yet be confused why other people don't recognize it.
Never simply attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence, but also never simply attribute to incompetence what can be explained by disagreement.
Other people and organizations can disagree with your arguments in ways that you don't think are logical or sound, but that doesn't mean they aren't just based on different weights and criteria. It's not useful to assume the decision criteria, because it becomes too easy to declare yourself right yet be confused why other people don't recognize it.
Never simply attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence, but also never simply attribute to incompetence what can be explained by disagreement.