This guy seems to fundamentally misunderstand open source. It was not at all about permissive licenses, but it _was_ about "rebranding" free software to sound less ideologically-driven, while still pretty much meeting the same criteria that free software supports.
I think his "war" is actually on MIT/BSD licensing, but it just kind of comes out of nowhere? Who is this guy, what problems has he had or observed?
I think his "war" is actually on MIT/BSD licensing, but it just kind of comes out of nowhere? Who is this guy, what problems has he had or observed?