> not about making every function async regardless of whether it needs it.
That's what you and I wrote. That's not what the article wrote.
"efforts to be async amount to nothing unless the entire call stack is async"
The entire call stack?
"it is best to go all in, and make everything async at once."
Go all in?
This beyond 'a little bit unclear' into 'incorrect' territory, especially since the preceding paragraph said "there's been lots of confusion on the best practices for async and how to use it properly."
Is there a single NB or asterisk-like comment on the whole page that walks back the "all in" comment to something like "calling sync from async is fine." ?
That's what you and I wrote. That's not what the article wrote.
"efforts to be async amount to nothing unless the entire call stack is async"
The entire call stack?
"it is best to go all in, and make everything async at once."
Go all in?
This beyond 'a little bit unclear' into 'incorrect' territory, especially since the preceding paragraph said "there's been lots of confusion on the best practices for async and how to use it properly."
Is there a single NB or asterisk-like comment on the whole page that walks back the "all in" comment to something like "calling sync from async is fine." ?