No criticism at this particular thing, but it is a good opportunity to mention that GPT-5 only exists if you have non-public information.
Sure it does. I mention because it is not a good sign that “people are getting this,” when youtubers are using headlines like “What GPT-7 means for your sales leads!”
The fallacy is kind of allowed by us who understand it better, when we accept semver from companies as actually being incremental, and accurate public information.
It’s not like these models are all just matrices of weights, they are radical architectural experiments.
Sure it does. I mention because it is not a good sign that “people are getting this,” when youtubers are using headlines like “What GPT-7 means for your sales leads!”
The fallacy is kind of allowed by us who understand it better, when we accept semver from companies as actually being incremental, and accurate public information.
It’s not like these models are all just matrices of weights, they are radical architectural experiments.