> If they can’t serve EU users profitably without violating their privacy they have every right to pull out of the market.
The article clearly mentions how they are only 'violating the rights' if the user chooses to agree with it rather than paying a subscription. It's a trade.
Why do you think people are entitled to consume free content with no strings attached?
The article clearly mentions how they are only 'violating the rights' if the user chooses to agree with it rather than paying a subscription. It's a trade.
Why do you think people are entitled to consume free content with no strings attached?