As it should. AI “enhancement” is just making up extra details in the video that aren’t there to begin with. There is no rational basis to allow it to be used because the only reason to present that “enhanced” footage is because the actual footage doesn’t show what you want it to show, but by having it artificially enhanced you can then convince the jury that the footage is more detailed than it really is.
That this is even up for debate is insane. It is literally no different from allowing someone to present photoshopped images as evidence.
That this is even up for debate is insane. It is literally no different from allowing someone to present photoshopped images as evidence.