> Ahh the eternal cycle of static vs dynamic linking swings around again.
Somewhat. Although it's agnostic to static vs dynamic linking. The philosophy goes a bit deeper than that.
> See? that saved 35739475749Kb of storage!
Storage capacity hasn't been relevant for over a decade.
Besides, we foolishly replaced "use shared modules to save storage space" with "build multi-gigabyte docker images because it's the only way to reliably launch a simple program without crashing on startup".
Somewhat. Although it's agnostic to static vs dynamic linking. The philosophy goes a bit deeper than that.
> See? that saved 35739475749Kb of storage!
Storage capacity hasn't been relevant for over a decade.
Besides, we foolishly replaced "use shared modules to save storage space" with "build multi-gigabyte docker images because it's the only way to reliably launch a simple program without crashing on startup".