It's disappointing that this response linked by OP was posted at all. And even more disappointing because context gets lost every time it shows up on HN.
The linked email is from an HPE/Cray employee interacting with the upstream gcc team, not from anyone in the U.S. government.
The U.S. Government, via lots of programs, national labs, etc. does pay people (and companies) to work on open source code. This has at various points included LLVM, clang, flang, gcc, and many other projects. We like it when things get upstreamed and we also contribute ourselves to these projects.
Certain companies' willingness to put in the work required to upstream has been an issue at times, but it is improving and it's something that we push on very hard.
The linked email is from an HPE/Cray employee interacting with the upstream gcc team, not from anyone in the U.S. government.
The U.S. Government, via lots of programs, national labs, etc. does pay people (and companies) to work on open source code. This has at various points included LLVM, clang, flang, gcc, and many other projects. We like it when things get upstreamed and we also contribute ourselves to these projects.
Certain companies' willingness to put in the work required to upstream has been an issue at times, but it is improving and it's something that we push on very hard.