While I understand the annoyance at a game shutting down and you can no longer play it.
I also strongly oppose this from a technical prospective. It costs money to run servers, it costs money to maintain servers.
It costs engineering effort to keep servers updated and secure.
The idea that you can't shut down your servers is just wrong.
(However an argument that a single player game does not work without being online is completely valid, but seems to not be the point of this).
So no will not be signing and if there was a government requirement to keep servers running, I guarantee you the result will be less games released. It just would not be worth the risk.
Edit: I misunderstood the point is not to keep servers running but to provide a way to run the servers ourselves. Which while my point above is about a different problem I still fundamentally disagree with that requirement.
I also strongly oppose this from a technical prospective. It costs money to run servers, it costs money to maintain servers.
It costs engineering effort to keep servers updated and secure.
The idea that you can't shut down your servers is just wrong.
(However an argument that a single player game does not work without being online is completely valid, but seems to not be the point of this).
So no will not be signing and if there was a government requirement to keep servers running, I guarantee you the result will be less games released. It just would not be worth the risk.
Edit: I misunderstood the point is not to keep servers running but to provide a way to run the servers ourselves. Which while my point above is about a different problem I still fundamentally disagree with that requirement.