You act like you were misled, but the article, within the first few sentences, says he realized the tools are available to do this (including naming tesseract.js explicitly!), he just needed to glue them together. Then he details how he does that, and only then mentions he used an LLM to help him in that process. The author's article title is equally not misleading.
Was an earlier headline or subtitle here on HN what was misleading, but then that was changed to not be misleading?
Was an earlier headline or subtitle here on HN what was misleading, but then that was changed to not be misleading?