Maybe entanglement is a much more 'immediately physical' phenomenon than 'spooky action at a distance'. Just guessing as a layman here: maybe entangled particles are just physically connected {along some higher dimension / some unknown process}.
Spinning together (effectively switching spaces constantly) such that they are always the same state. So the undetermined measurement stems from being unable to tell which particle specifically you have at the time of measurement.
The idea of a particle's spin being 1/2 feels tied to this idea - (that a 720 rotation happens: if a particle P1 spins 360 in space A, spins 360 in space B before returning to space A, maybe entanglement is P1 and P2 filling space A and B to 'full'?)
In other words - detector A may receive particle B or A depending on the particle's current orientation at measurement.
Maybe entanglement is a much more 'immediately physical' phenomenon than 'spooky action at a distance'. Just guessing as a layman here: maybe entangled particles are just physically connected {along some higher dimension / some unknown process}.
Spinning together (effectively switching spaces constantly) such that they are always the same state. So the undetermined measurement stems from being unable to tell which particle specifically you have at the time of measurement.
The idea of a particle's spin being 1/2 feels tied to this idea - (that a 720 rotation happens: if a particle P1 spins 360 in space A, spins 360 in space B before returning to space A, maybe entanglement is P1 and P2 filling space A and B to 'full'?)
In other words - detector A may receive particle B or A depending on the particle's current orientation at measurement.
Weird thoughts. Take with a lot of salt.