Only tangentially related, but I think the mid/late game is a much more interesting/useful/hard avenue for chess tools.
Chess.com's opening explorer is pretty good, which it seems like this is kind of trying to compete against.
What I struggle with is the post game review, where I make a dubious move but I don't actually understand the reason why it's bad. Sure, the engine shows better moves and the refutation to my move, but I often don't know why. The automatically generated explanation is usually pretty poor.
I wish I had even a poor copy of Danya giving me commentary.
Perhaps I should just lean in and try to implement something like this, but focus it more on coaching than commentary.
Chess.com's opening explorer is pretty good, which it seems like this is kind of trying to compete against.
What I struggle with is the post game review, where I make a dubious move but I don't actually understand the reason why it's bad. Sure, the engine shows better moves and the refutation to my move, but I often don't know why. The automatically generated explanation is usually pretty poor.
I wish I had even a poor copy of Danya giving me commentary.
Perhaps I should just lean in and try to implement something like this, but focus it more on coaching than commentary.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2212.08195.pdf