> Wow. That's a new low standard for journalism. Whatever happened to keeping opinions and news separate?
You seem to have some idealized view of journalism that has never existed. The fact that you linked to the nytimes...
> And no, modern Congress is not more corrupt than historical standards
That's a straw man. He didn't say congress was 'more corrupt' than before. He just wrote 'grotesquely corrupt congress'. You surely can see the difference. If not, you'd make an excellent journalist.
You seem to have some idealized view of journalism that has never existed. The fact that you linked to the nytimes...
> And no, modern Congress is not more corrupt than historical standards
That's a straw man. He didn't say congress was 'more corrupt' than before. He just wrote 'grotesquely corrupt congress'. You surely can see the difference. If not, you'd make an excellent journalist.