> They produce generic, amateurish copy that reads like it's written by committee.
If you were only using GPT 3.5 (free ChatGPT) then your opinion is irrelevant.
With GPT-4 you could directly ask it: "rewrite your previous response so that it sounds less generic, less amateurish, and not written by a committee". I'm not even joking. Just provide enough information and tell it what to do. If you don't like the output then tell it what needs to be improved. It's not a mind reader.
Also GPT-4 is a year old now. Claude 3 is already superior and GPT-5 will be next level.
If you were only using GPT 3.5 (free ChatGPT) then your opinion is irrelevant.
With GPT-4 you could directly ask it: "rewrite your previous response so that it sounds less generic, less amateurish, and not written by a committee". I'm not even joking. Just provide enough information and tell it what to do. If you don't like the output then tell it what needs to be improved. It's not a mind reader.
Also GPT-4 is a year old now. Claude 3 is already superior and GPT-5 will be next level.