I find it interesting that generally the first instinct seems to be to use LLMs for writing test code rather than the implementation. Maybe I've done too much TDD, but to me the tests describe how the system is supposed to behave. This is very much what I want the human to define and the code should fit within the guardrails set by the tests.
I could see it as very helpful though for an LLM to point out underspecified areas. Maybe having it propose unit tests for underspecified areas is a way to do look at that and what's happening here?
Edit: Even before LLMs were a thing, I sometimes wondered if monkeys on type writers could write my application once I've written all the tests.
I could see it as very helpful though for an LLM to point out underspecified areas. Maybe having it propose unit tests for underspecified areas is a way to do look at that and what's happening here?
Edit: Even before LLMs were a thing, I sometimes wondered if monkeys on type writers could write my application once I've written all the tests.