1. Since this is for "early myopia", does it mean it is useless for adults? If not, which groups of adults will find it useful?
2. What do you think about this and is this even related?
> The overall findings are equivocal with under‐correction causing a faster rate of myopia progression. There is no strong evidence of benefits from un‐correction, monovision or over‐correction. Hence, current clinical advice advocates for the full‐correction of myopia
1. Since this is for "early myopia", does it mean it is useless for adults? If not, which groups of adults will find it useful?
2. What do you think about this and is this even related?
> The overall findings are equivocal with under‐correction causing a faster rate of myopia progression. There is no strong evidence of benefits from un‐correction, monovision or over‐correction. Hence, current clinical advice advocates for the full‐correction of myopia
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1111/cxo.12978
Edit to clarify, full correction with glasses should mean always seeing the sharpest picture possible