On one hand, I agree that just disagreeing with a guideline isn’t perjury. Especially in a case like this where lots of the industry still uses the old (bad, imo) plan.
On the other, an expert witness has specifically represented themselves to be an expert. Is there any level of incompetence that raises to the level of perjury in that case? IMO there ought to be.
On the other, an expert witness has specifically represented themselves to be an expert. Is there any level of incompetence that raises to the level of perjury in that case? IMO there ought to be.