> They seem to care more about the LLM delivering code with poor accessibility than they care about the LLM delivering completely wrong answers.
I think the idea with this is that if it gives you completely wrong answers and the code doesn't work, it will obviously not work and have to figure out how to fix it.
Meanwhile when it gives you code that appears to do what you wanted except the accessibility is broken, you'll ship it because you don't realize there's anything wrong with it.
I think the idea with this is that if it gives you completely wrong answers and the code doesn't work, it will obviously not work and have to figure out how to fix it.
Meanwhile when it gives you code that appears to do what you wanted except the accessibility is broken, you'll ship it because you don't realize there's anything wrong with it.