Comment

Comment by camdez

The exact semantics of the problem aren't clear (do we need to maintain order? Do we need to use the initial count? Why do we have counts on subsequent elements if we only add 1?), but the logical Clojure solution would just be:

  (frequencies (map second v))
  ;; => {"one" 2, "two" 2, "three" 1, "four" 1}

  ;; or:

  (update-vals (group-by second v) count)
  ;; => {"one" 2, "two" 2, "three" 1, "four" 1}

  ;; +(#:'=v[;1];?v[;1])
  ;; flip(count each group v[;1];unique v[;1])
So, shorter than the readable K version in a Lisp.

What did we learn here? Probably nothing.

K is great for sequence operations--not sure what we're trying to imply about Lisps.

parent camdez 2 years ago

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton