Edit: not stated at all in this, but which my main point, is that the mistake was that the jury messed up on the compensatory damages, not that the punitive damages are wrong. Coffee is still kicking in...
Ok, so active harassment of a person, by a think tank, perpetuating lies and making comparisons to pedophilia is "no damages"?
This spurred on harassment including hacking of email contents.
What is possibly "icky" about a defamation result, other than the jury didn't find higher compensatory damages?
If it's OK in our society for individuals to be attacked with lies like this, with money undirected through think tanks, are you OK with your professional life and personal life being intruded in this way with lies? Really?
Ok, so active harassment of a person, by a think tank, perpetuating lies and making comparisons to pedophilia is "no damages"?
This spurred on harassment including hacking of email contents.
What is possibly "icky" about a defamation result, other than the jury didn't find higher compensatory damages?
If it's OK in our society for individuals to be attacked with lies like this, with money undirected through think tanks, are you OK with your professional life and personal life being intruded in this way with lies? Really?