Let say for a moment that it is acceptable for the CEO of a corporation working on the independence of the Web to not have her personal independent webpage.
I know, absurd, but let’s assume.
Let say for a moment that it is acceptable that the personal independent webpage is replaced by a monopolistic platform trying to centralize the web.
I know, absurd, but let’s assume
Let say for a moment that we don’t care that the platform is owned by one of the biggest competitor of the corporation. Historically and currently.
I know, absurd, but let’s assume.
Let say for a moment that it is not a problem that the platform is one of the worst offender when regarding privacy of its users and handling personal data, even if the new CEO is talking about privacy.
I know, absurd, but let’s assume.
Let say that to there’s no problem in requiring every person clicking this link to have an account on the linked platform to know who the privacy-oriented new CEO is.
I know, absurd, but let’s assume.
Let say that nobody at Mozilla considered it to be a problem as the introductory post of the new CEO…
I know, absurd, but let’s assume.
Let say for a moment that it is acceptable that the personal independent webpage is replaced by a monopolistic platform trying to centralize the web.
I know, absurd, but let’s assume
Let say for a moment that we don’t care that the platform is owned by one of the biggest competitor of the corporation. Historically and currently.
I know, absurd, but let’s assume.
Let say for a moment that it is not a problem that the platform is one of the worst offender when regarding privacy of its users and handling personal data, even if the new CEO is talking about privacy.
I know, absurd, but let’s assume.
Let say that to there’s no problem in requiring every person clicking this link to have an account on the linked platform to know who the privacy-oriented new CEO is.
I know, absurd, but let’s assume.
Let say that nobody at Mozilla considered it to be a problem as the introductory post of the new CEO…