>they'll claim they are "Security related barriers" and therefore exempt?
Why would it be exempt?
The obvious cynical ploy is extending the EULA idea and apple becoming a phone leasing company.
Going from hardware you don't really own, to hardware you really don't own.
Why would it be exempt?
The obvious cynical ploy is extending the EULA idea and apple becoming a phone leasing company. Going from hardware you don't really own, to hardware you really don't own.