It’s really not. The Third Party Doctrine has muddied the Fourth Amendment’s legal boundaries. The fact that a district judge originally ruled in the FBI’s favour should show that.
> Everyone associated should be fired
If they continue to think they did the right thing, sure. That’s incapacitation. But prioritising retribution isn’t helpful when restitution and deterrence are unfulfilled.
It’s really not. The Third Party Doctrine has muddied the Fourth Amendment’s legal boundaries. The fact that a district judge originally ruled in the FBI’s favour should show that.
> Everyone associated should be fired
If they continue to think they did the right thing, sure. That’s incapacitation. But prioritising retribution isn’t helpful when restitution and deterrence are unfulfilled.