A tangent: This style of status page and the goal that most of these projects (like this) try to achieve is always displaying the uptime of a service based on some HTTP request. In how many cases is this actually the whole story? GitHub can serve perfectly fine HTTP content, it's still broken without git via ssh. Amazon can have their site up but if payments aren't being processed, that's worth nothing.
This is not a complaint against this specific project but am I the only one that feels that this style of status page that "has been around since the mid 2010s" rarely ever tells the full story of a service's health?
A tangent: This style of status page and the goal that most of these projects (like this) try to achieve is always displaying the uptime of a service based on some HTTP request. In how many cases is this actually the whole story? GitHub can serve perfectly fine HTTP content, it's still broken without git via ssh. Amazon can have their site up but if payments aren't being processed, that's worth nothing.
This is not a complaint against this specific project but am I the only one that feels that this style of status page that "has been around since the mid 2010s" rarely ever tells the full story of a service's health?