I've had to reread, I was certain I missed something. But no, this is entirely conspiratorial speculation without any basis _or_ even without any point?
If at least they explicitly put forward a theory like "it's russian influence to slow down western digital development" it would have some internal consistency, but no. They suppose it's russian influence (again, without basis) without any theory of _why_ Russia would care about an inconsequential CSS-related lib. Shrug.
If at least they explicitly put forward a theory like "it's russian influence to slow down western digital development" it would have some internal consistency, but no. They suppose it's russian influence (again, without basis) without any theory of _why_ Russia would care about an inconsequential CSS-related lib. Shrug.