Sure, no one denies that the government hires experts. The people who have a problem with Chevron deference would question if those "experts" have the ability to make rules outside of what congress actually set out to regulate.
The question in these cases is if those experts can interpret the ambiguity in a statute to make rules that may or may not have actually been the intent of congress. Personally, I think the answer should be "no".
The question in these cases is if those experts can interpret the ambiguity in a statute to make rules that may or may not have actually been the intent of congress. Personally, I think the answer should be "no".