> The point of having laws is to resolve the problem
This statement is normative and has no relation to how laws are actually created.
Can you name a framework of laws that was implemented by a sovereign, explicitly developed to resolve the problem of heterogeneous goal vectors for a defined political population?
I’m unaware of one.
All foundational “constitutions” I’m aware of were written - not as treaties that were negotiated as partners during peace that have explicit and well defined ethical principles that need to be accommodated for - rather each side claim discrete and finite sovereignty and only at the point that one group shows overwhelming violent dominance is imminent do groups grudgingly carve out their own territory.
So no, there is no coherent process for lawmaking that does anything other than encode the desires of the dominant political arm into the structures of its own making.
This statement is normative and has no relation to how laws are actually created.
Can you name a framework of laws that was implemented by a sovereign, explicitly developed to resolve the problem of heterogeneous goal vectors for a defined political population?
I’m unaware of one.
All foundational “constitutions” I’m aware of were written - not as treaties that were negotiated as partners during peace that have explicit and well defined ethical principles that need to be accommodated for - rather each side claim discrete and finite sovereignty and only at the point that one group shows overwhelming violent dominance is imminent do groups grudgingly carve out their own territory.
So no, there is no coherent process for lawmaking that does anything other than encode the desires of the dominant political arm into the structures of its own making.