Really, the difference seems to be almost exclusively wording. Both licenses grant very broad powers to the service to redistribute (Google is guilty only of enumerating them more fully, where Dropbox simply claims "all the permissions we need"). Both providers include language that they will only do this in order "to provide the service", but neither enumerates exactly what that means.
Does anyone see anything specific that Dropbox can't do that Google can? That grant looks really broad to me, just ... friendlier.
Does anyone see anything specific that Dropbox can't do that Google can? That grant looks really broad to me, just ... friendlier.