Agree this completely. So much scientific evidence I see published is just survey results from participants...which is sometimes just marketing or question phrasing. It's often enough to run with a headline though.
The standard for that evidence should be very different than the standard for reproducible physics, chemistry and biology experiments.
Other times it's just an extrapolation of a preexisting data set. Running this query produced this result.
The standard for that evidence should be very different than the standard for reproducible physics, chemistry and biology experiments.
Other times it's just an extrapolation of a preexisting data set. Running this query produced this result.