> This retraction is Tessier-Lavigne’s fourth in as many months, a stunning turn of events for a researcher of his stature.
That says a lot about how worthless the whole science journal and peer review process is. At this rate your assumption is that 50% of what is published is complete junk.
That says a lot about how worthless the whole science journal and peer review process is. At this rate your assumption is that 50% of what is published is complete junk.