So what’s the deal with lesswrong? People there seem to take a generally academic-ish or intellectual-ish tone, but there aren’t any sources in this article and:
> Why? Most basically, because humans are only just on the cusp of general intelligence. Perhaps 5% of the population has enough abstract reasoning skill to verbally understand that the above heuristics would be useful once these heuristics are pointed out.
> Why? Most basically, because humans are only just on the cusp of general intelligence. Perhaps 5% of the population has enough abstract reasoning skill to verbally understand that the above heuristics would be useful once these heuristics are pointed out.
Is a wild claim to make unsupported, right?