The claim about those models being "statistical". Why wouldn't you consider human brain to be statistical or animal's brains as "statistical"?
Because in the end human brains as well as any brains it seems they could be thought of statistical results from long periods of training and producing output from input. Where am I wrong?
I assume by statistical you mean that the ending result of state of neurons can be represented as numbers and pathways leading through these as probabilities of going through a certain pathway - but it occurs to me that same is with human brain, no?
Because in the end human brains as well as any brains it seems they could be thought of statistical results from long periods of training and producing output from input. Where am I wrong?
I assume by statistical you mean that the ending result of state of neurons can be represented as numbers and pathways leading through these as probabilities of going through a certain pathway - but it occurs to me that same is with human brain, no?