I can't tell if there's anything here I should be trying to learn. Best I can tell it's choosing obtuse naming for Static and Dynamic typing.
> Summary: Static vs dynamic typing debates often flounder because the debators see from two different perspectives without knowing it. Learning to identify the two perspectives can calm the discussion. The tension between the two perspectives has led to Gradual Typing and other technologies.
I'm not buying this. The best pragmatic answer for myself is that static types is better in large or across teams. Dynamic typing is good for solo or early development by a small team. Gradual typing is the best you can get when a product developed with dynamic typing grows to be developed by many.
> Summary: Static vs dynamic typing debates often flounder because the debators see from two different perspectives without knowing it. Learning to identify the two perspectives can calm the discussion. The tension between the two perspectives has led to Gradual Typing and other technologies.
I'm not buying this. The best pragmatic answer for myself is that static types is better in large or across teams. Dynamic typing is good for solo or early development by a small team. Gradual typing is the best you can get when a product developed with dynamic typing grows to be developed by many.