> You are reading very selectively (and I think fir a reason):
I've wrote what is in Overview section in the article. Which is "The rockets have killed 28 people and injured hundreds more."
> Please at least try to stay true to the facts, even if you are not willing to steelman the other's arguments.
Please don't imply intentions that were not mine. When I skimmed the article, I literally didn't see the information you mentioned. What would even be the point of that "selective reading"? Are we discussing a difference of 10-20 people against a figure of 17,000? This doesn't make sense.
I've wrote what is in Overview section in the article. Which is "The rockets have killed 28 people and injured hundreds more."
> Please at least try to stay true to the facts, even if you are not willing to steelman the other's arguments.
Please don't imply intentions that were not mine. When I skimmed the article, I literally didn't see the information you mentioned. What would even be the point of that "selective reading"? Are we discussing a difference of 10-20 people against a figure of 17,000? This doesn't make sense.