Articles like this seem to get published most often when a problem turns out to be worse than we thought. That makes sense - and I suspect that, on balance, we've been overly optimistic about how much warming will come from each source, but it can't always be worse than we thought.
Presumably people making climate models must keep up on the latest info on how much each element contributes, with some of them being less warming than predicted. Are there places that collect that information? Is there any way to see the aggregate change in overall understanding?
Presumably people making climate models must keep up on the latest info on how much each element contributes, with some of them being less warming than predicted. Are there places that collect that information? Is there any way to see the aggregate change in overall understanding?