All things considered, we must postulate the possibility that killing the bird is purposeful.
It would not be the first time that a company has been tanked with the intention of purchasing it at its lowest value.
A “good Knight” charges in offering 1 cent on the dollar (or .1 or .01 etc.) the purchasing company may appear as having no association with said person, but is indeed deemed “a friendly “
It would not be the first time that a company has been tanked with the intention of purchasing it at its lowest value.
A “good Knight” charges in offering 1 cent on the dollar (or .1 or .01 etc.) the purchasing company may appear as having no association with said person, but is indeed deemed “a friendly “
This is a possibility, who can tell?