Comment by eigenvalue

I really don’t understand why a big company would continue to trust Okta with the most critical parts of their security infrastructure (identity) after multiple huge security breaches. And not just breaches, but ones where the company appears to be dishonest (or at least not very forthcoming) in their responses to those breaches, where they attempt to minimize the severity and their own culpability. Why not just use Microsoft or Google for this, which seem to have better recent security track records and certainly more overall security capabilities? How is Okta still a $10b+ market cap company? I don’t get it.