This is straightforward guilt-by-association: because of the mere fact that Scott interacted with people espousing neo reactionary views, he must also be sympathetic to those views. Of course, this is completed wrong and easily known by reading Scotts writings on the topic: https://slatestarcodex.com/2013/10/20/the-anti-reactionary-f...
There is zero way to say in good faith the Scott espouses or even agrees with neo reactionism.
There is zero way to say in good faith the Scott espouses or even agrees with neo reactionism.