That's a ridiculous statement with nothing to back it up.
> The “97% of scientists agree” turned out to be plain old BS
Again, you'll need to provide some evidence if you're going to try to dispute the findings of an entire field of science.
You do come across as some kind of denier as you're just throwing around statements with no evidence and to be honest, there's always people like you popping up when there's discussion of climate change and it's annoying because invariably those people are not even scientists themselves, but feel that just reading conspiracy websites makes them into an expert.
That's a ridiculous statement with nothing to back it up.
> The “97% of scientists agree” turned out to be plain old BS
Again, you'll need to provide some evidence if you're going to try to dispute the findings of an entire field of science.
You do come across as some kind of denier as you're just throwing around statements with no evidence and to be honest, there's always people like you popping up when there's discussion of climate change and it's annoying because invariably those people are not even scientists themselves, but feel that just reading conspiracy websites makes them into an expert.