You obviously do not understand tenders and also have a bad faith in addressing this message towards me (García-Ripoll) and Artur.
First of all, this tender only received one application. There could have been other applicants as it happened in Galicia's quantum computer tender, but there were none.
Second, this application was done by a collective of companies of which Qilimanjaro is only one more participant, responsible for calibration and integration.
Third, my role as scientist in this evaluation was only to certify that the specifications of the tender proposal follow the scientific requirements of the call, and whether any parameter is below or above the requested standards. That is tickboxing essentially and with only one applicant this does not influence the outcome.
So I am asking you to retract these accusations as I am concerned, or follow suit if you have so much evidence of wrongdoing.
First of all, this tender only received one application. There could have been other applicants as it happened in Galicia's quantum computer tender, but there were none.
Second, this application was done by a collective of companies of which Qilimanjaro is only one more participant, responsible for calibration and integration.
Third, my role as scientist in this evaluation was only to certify that the specifications of the tender proposal follow the scientific requirements of the call, and whether any parameter is below or above the requested standards. That is tickboxing essentially and with only one applicant this does not influence the outcome.
So I am asking you to retract these accusations as I am concerned, or follow suit if you have so much evidence of wrongdoing.