Comment by hintymad

I was reading the trial report by Inner City Press. The AUSAs were incredibly thorough and strategic. The evidences were air-tight, the cross-examination was masterfully controlled with precision and incisiveness, and of course the closing argument was forceful. It was a great joy to read the report, as if I was watching an extended episode of The Good Fight. On the other hand, the defense was really weak, quite hand-wavy, and resorted to arguing about not-so-irrelevant specifics like how hard SBF worked. The closing arguments of the defense can be summarized as SBF was not guilty because he spent all the customer money on investment, on political donation, on private plane, and on company-owned real estate properties. They were company expenditures to build a business, not for personal gains. Therefore, SBF did not have any intention of committing a crime.