>If you let bigots talk, you will get more bigotry and in the end a less free society.
By definition, a bigot is "a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices" [1].
There are bigots on both the left and the right. No one is saying there aren't bigots on the right. What the survey is saying that the majority of the people obstinately devoted to their own opinions are on the left. For some reason, many people on the left become obstinate when anyone (even a self-identifying liberal) makes that observation.
>They wanted extreme private property rights, well that's how you get 'cancel culture'.
Nope, "extreme private property rights" have existed in the US for hundreds of years. Also, cancel culture is about cancelling people who espouse a particular idea. I refer you to copyright and patent law enforcement to see how attempts to enforce property rights on an idea has played out across history. There are many reasonable and unreasonable ways to do so.
[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot
By definition, a bigot is "a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices" [1].
There are bigots on both the left and the right. No one is saying there aren't bigots on the right. What the survey is saying that the majority of the people obstinately devoted to their own opinions are on the left. For some reason, many people on the left become obstinate when anyone (even a self-identifying liberal) makes that observation.
>They wanted extreme private property rights, well that's how you get 'cancel culture'.
Nope, "extreme private property rights" have existed in the US for hundreds of years. Also, cancel culture is about cancelling people who espouse a particular idea. I refer you to copyright and patent law enforcement to see how attempts to enforce property rights on an idea has played out across history. There are many reasonable and unreasonable ways to do so.
[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot