What a weird article. A whole lot of words to say, "hiring low performers will hurt your company"?
And the alternative is, "hire good people but not with the PM role"?
It reads like someone had a bad experience with a PM who thought they were Steve Jobs. PMs are just ordinary people, I don't understand this supposition that anyone holding the title is going be an entitled douchbag. An org can have thousands of PMs, each with a superior.
And the alternative is, "hire good people but not with the PM role"?
It reads like someone had a bad experience with a PM who thought they were Steve Jobs. PMs are just ordinary people, I don't understand this supposition that anyone holding the title is going be an entitled douchbag. An org can have thousands of PMs, each with a superior.
Just a weird article