> Hey, listen, the company is putting a lot of effort into pfSense for which they are not paid.
And? pfsense uses thousands of packages that they don't pay for either, that's the spirit of open source, I can't understand who post this on HN without understanding it.
@dang: Can we ban these comments? Lately they arrive like clockwork and bring very little to the comments, especially since it doesn't seem to be talking about anyone here.
edit: at the time of this comment I can't find any top post complaining like the OP is describing.
And? pfsense uses thousands of packages that they don't pay for either, that's the spirit of open source, I can't understand who post this on HN without understanding it.
@dang: Can we ban these comments? Lately they arrive like clockwork and bring very little to the comments, especially since it doesn't seem to be talking about anyone here.
edit: at the time of this comment I can't find any top post complaining like the OP is describing.