Comment

Comment by _a_a_a_

It's about the entire set of formalisms given in the pdf, not just lambda calculus. The argument here about LC was because I had just given a snippet of it, but it's not the whole paper.

Now, the next bit – so I've spent my 15 minutes reading up on each of these formalisms (lambda calculus, intuitionistic logic, Hoare notation, whatever else). So now I can read the paper and I do, and now I have absolutely no way of making use of anything I've learnt. I spent personally a lot of time on the computer science side of things, and I have got frankly just about nothing out of it. So frankly again, there's no point learning it (from a utilitarian perspective).

When I was a kid I picked up a book on Fortran 4 and tried to learn it from the book, without a computer. That's pretty much the situation here – a passive notation that, had I managed to internalise it, would have been completely useless because I had no computer to run it on. And I'm tired of this discussion of people saying it's easy and it's useful, because it's not easy, and it's not useful without a whole lot more studying an application to bridge the abstraction of the formalism to the actual programming environment where I can use it.

Please just stop repeating stuff.

parent _a_a_a_ 3 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton