I don’t get what people are trying to say when they say these kinds of things about AI. That human-level writing is as simple as a linear regression? That we could’ve had computer programs capable of human-level writing decades ago? Have they not used these AIs enough to see how powerful they are? Are they seeing the bad outputs and thinking that AIs are always doing that poorly?
Like seriously, if you’re telling me that it was obvious that a “linear regression” could pass the LSAT I’ve got a macvlan to sell you.
Like seriously, if you’re telling me that it was obvious that a “linear regression” could pass the LSAT I’ve got a macvlan to sell you.
Edit: they’re also literally not linear regression! https://youtu.be/Ae9EKCyI1xU?feature=shared