Can someone help me understand why when there’s a record cold month, there’s a convo like this
> non-believer: “see global warming doesn’t exist”
> believer: “you can’t measure this on a monthly scale, it’s too slow of a process”
But often when the case is reversed, it’s used as evidence of global warming? I know global warming is real and I am a firm believer in it but this duality seems to cause a lot of issues when discussing global warming.
> non-believer: “see global warming doesn’t exist” > believer: “you can’t measure this on a monthly scale, it’s too slow of a process”
But often when the case is reversed, it’s used as evidence of global warming? I know global warming is real and I am a firm believer in it but this duality seems to cause a lot of issues when discussing global warming.